This moment reminded me of something I see constantly in third-party risk management: technical credentials don’t always guarantee reliability. Just as choosing the right climbing partner can mean the difference between success and disaster, selecting the right vendor requires more than just verifying their capabilities—it requires alignment in how they approach risk.
The best climbing guides don’t just know how to climb; they’re trained to manage risk for others. Certifications like AMGA Mountain Guide accreditation prove they follow strict safety protocols. Similarly, in the business world, security certifications like ISO 27001, SOC 2, and HITRUST provide assurance that vendors meet rigorous operational standards—not just once, but through ongoing compliance and audits.
In a last-ditch effort, my partner tried to call for assistance, assuming there would be cell service. There wasn’t. We were stranded, and our only option was to carefully descend via a series of short rappels.
This experience is a perfect parallel to third-party risk assumptions in business. Many organizations trust a vendor’s past performance and assume that reliability is guaranteed—but technology evolves, regulations shift, and leadership changes. If you’re not continuously verifying your vendors, you may discover gaps when it’s too late.
GRC Lesson: Never rely on assumptions. Continuous vendor monitoring, regular audits, and up-to-date certifications are essential to ensure they remain a trustworthy partner.
The ordeal forced me to reexamine my criteria for choosing both climbing partners and third-party vendors. Over time, I established four strict requirements that directly align with core principles in third-party risk management:
GRC Lesson: Define non-negotiables for your vendors. Ensure they follow certified security practices, make data-driven decisions, and have clear contingency planning in place.
This is precisely what risk management teams must do. Historical data—incident reports, audit findings, and near-misses—are some of the most valuable tools in refining risk strategies. Regular assessments, formal training, and adherence to evolving certification standards help prevent complacency and reinforce a culture of continuous improvement.
GRC Lesson: A vendor’s past mistakes and audit history should inform future risk assessments. Learn from prior failures, track improvements, and adjust vendor requirements accordingly.
Both climbing and risk management are not solely about reaching a goal; they are about ensuring a safe return while learning valuable lessons along the way. My multi-pitch climbing experience taught me that even with the right equipment and skills, unchecked assumptions and misaligned priorities can lead to dangerous outcomes.
Whether it’s an AMGA certification in the climbing world or security standards like ISO 27001, SOC 2, and HITRUST in the corporate arena, these certifications enhance trust and build a resilient risk management framework.
By aligning technical competence with strategic alignment and certified standards, you not only mitigate risks but also create a robust, dependable system—capable of weathering the most unpredictable challenges, be they on a cliff face or in today’s complex business landscape.
Run a vendor risk assessment today to ensure your third parties align with your security needs. Learn how SimpleRisk can help.